Archive for the 'Reviews' Category

Nokia N900 – First Impressions

After the dissapointing N97 it was all to easy to dismiss Nokia as a fading star of mobile phone design. The flagship which failed to float was the perfect excuse for a whole horde of doomsayers to predict the end of the once-greatest mobile company. A common quip was that unless Nokia were to pull off something entirely miraculous it would be “the end”. Fortunately the N900 is the miracle we had all hoped for, a truly remarkable combination of new software and hardware.

It’s hard to disentangle all the novelty in this new phone: Not only is it the first of a brand new form-factor (the sliding landscape keyboard-phone), but it’s also the first phone in Nokia’s huge portfolio to feature Maemo, an operating system entirely new to the world of phones. That’s not to say that Maemo is new: It’s been on the market since 2006 but only on Nokia’s ultra-niche tablet computers. Mameo itself has an even longer pedigree – it’s an offshoot of Debian Linux, a highly regarded variant of the increasingly popular desktop operating system.

First of all, lets deal with the easy stuff- the hardware: Nokia vastly simplified the slider mechanism compared to the N97. Instead of the elaborate slide and tilt, this keyboard simply slides out from behind the screen. While it doesn’t look so impressive it makes for a device which is both more comfortable and rugged. The new keyboard is slightly wider than the N97s since they ditched the somewhat useless D-pad. I guess they figured out that users don’t actually need a d-pad and a touch-screen if the touch screen is good enough.

Ony of my big criticisms of the N97 was it’s insensitive touch screen. At the time I put this down to the fact that Nokia had chosen the older “resistive” technology rather than the more trendy “capacitive” screens used by the iPhone and most android devices. The N900 has not switched to capacitative, and yet the screen seems a great deal more responsive. I’ve not yet encountered the frequent false-clicks of the older model. Nokia claim that the advantage of a resistive screen is that you can be more precise. This is why the N900 has a concealed stylus which slides out of the front. It’s not actually possible to use a stylus on a capacitative screen, so Nokia clearly see this as giving their customers wider choices.

The other major criticism of the N97 was that it seemed sluggish compared to the high-end phones: Once again this has seems to have been fixed. Even while multitasking the N900 seems to have the processing power to stay lively and responsive. This is no doubt a consequence of the shift to Nokia’s next generation operating system. Maemo is the phone’s biggest new feature: It’s an operating system unlike anything I’ve seen before on a mobile, but oddly similar to almost everything I’ve used on my desktop.

Unlike Symbian which was custom designed for telephony, Maemo was built for the Internet. The ability to make calls via the telephone network was a relatively recent addition to this operating system. As a consequence they’ve approached the idea of how telephone stuff ought to work in a radically different way: The most obvious benefit is that there’s a single framework for calling which handles VOIP (e.g. Skype and Google Talk) in exactly the same consistent way as a “regular” phone call. Likewise the messaging infrastructure seamlessly integrates SMS text messages with twitter, facebook and email. It all seems connected to a degree I’ve never seen before.

I dont want to give the impression that it was entirely perfect:

The biggest problem with Maemo today is a complete lack of commercial apps. None of the official Google Apps (e.g. Mail, Maps) have been ported to Symbian. It also lacks some of my favourites such as Spotify, BBC iPlayer and Last.fm. There’s no technical reason to doubt that these applications will eventually be ported to Maemo, however early adopters might need to beware that they might have to do without their favourite apps.

As compensation for the lack of apps, the web-browser is really good: Good enough (for example) to use the web-versions of Twitter, and BBC iPlayer. The built in multimedia conceals some pleasant surprises, such as the fact that that the it can handle high-definition DivX movie files and Ogg audio files. No other device I can think of can play all of these non-commerical formats despite the fact that they are hugely popular in the free-software world.

This lack of apps might seem scary, especially in comparison to Apple’s much hyped hundred-thousand but it’s not likely to be a problem in the long term: Unlike the older generation of phone which was built around proprietary code which was difficult for developers to learn the N900 is built on technology that is common today and widely used. Anybody who can develop for Linux can develop for this phone which means that there are already hundreds of thousands of developers who have the skills required to build Maemo apps. As a consequence I expect that Maemo will quickly catch up other platforms since the cost of building for this platform is relatively low.

So is the N900 the “iPhone Killer” that everybody’s been pining for? No, and thankfully not. I think this product represents an entirely new territory for the mobile phone industry. Rather than replicate Apple’s model of a tightly controlled environment, Nokia are emphasizing openness by borrowing a strategy which has worked so well for the open-source movement. This is the most open mobile platform on the market today, and I feel that proposition alone will draw in the “core” of developers who will in turn deliver the novel applications which will usher in a wider audience.

Chumby One – First impressions

I just received my Chumby One – the budget version of last year’s most hyped internet device. These days they are positioning it as the world’s most advanced bedside clock radio (which would be true apart from the fact that Pure Digital just launched the relatively expensive Sensia ).

Upon unboxing the device my first surprise was the size of the thing. The official photography gives the impression of a device which might be approximately fifteen to twenty cm wide. The actual device is slightly more than ten centimetres, and that’s including the volume knob which sticks out the side. It’s a really compact device.

Chumby comes with an international power adaptor. Set-up of the device consists of nothing more than attaching this to a wall-socket, plugging in the Chumby One and then answering some simple questions about the local WiFi connection. Initial set-up takes about five minutes. From then on all you have to do is choose what widgets you want and set up your multimedia.

There’s a wide selection of useful widgets, for example local five-day weather (provided by the BBC) or a the next 24 hours in your Google calendar. There are also some quite bizarre ones: The default channel includes a selection of popular videos from youtube and “Prelenger Mash-ups” which are wired video compositions assembled from the historical oddities curated at archive.org. You can also set up a Flickr.com viewer which converts the Chumby into a not particularly high-resolution digital photo frame. There are also quite a few social networking widgets including at least ten different ways to present your twitter feed along with some quite good facebook viewers.

All of the above would give the impression that Chumby is intended to be a practical device. Most of the widgets are rather silly and useless compared to the ones I have listed. Finding the good ones took about half an hour of search and at this point I’m convinced that most of the rest are redundant: There are a few hundred different variations on the idea of clock, and an awful lot of quite boring flash games which I shall pretend do not exist.

The other part of Chumby’s claim to fame is it’s multimedia: It comes with the ability to play internet radio and FM. I found the FM receiver was not particularly sensitive. It was barely able to receive very strong signals from nearby transmitters. That’s possibly a consequence of placing an FM receiver in the same tiny box as an active WiFi transceiver. I wonder why they bothered? Surely the people who buy this sort of device want it for it’s Internet capabilities.

Fortunately the Internet radio feature really does work. Unlike the widgets which are controlled via your web-browser from a PC, the multimedia features are controlled exclusively via the Chumby’s touch-screen. I’m not sure why they did this since the screen is rather small and it’s very difficult to select which from the thousands of Internet radio streams you want to hear.

The audio browser is very bad: In order to hear something you must first select from a range of sources including Pandora (not available in Europe), MediaFly, manually configured streams, FM Radio, a whole bunch of obscure audio aggregators, media files available via the USB or network. Having chosen your source you are then presented with multiple levels of hierarchical menu in order to select the actual audio audio you want to hear.

This part of the Chumby experience really does not work very well since switching from one kind of audio to another is a real nuisance. Even a modest DAB radio makes changing channels easy compared to this. I suspect that Chumby users will simply pick one audio source and leave it set to that rather than have the bother of browsing. I hope Chumby Industries find a way to simplify this – they could use the same web-interface they use to manage their widgets for audio.

Incidentally, this is how Pure and Reciva based radios work: You do all your browsing via a normal web-browser from your PC. On the device there’s no need to browse a huge menu – you can select from the favourites which you have already chosen.

In summary, I’m happy with the device. It’s an interesting addition to my bedroom. It looks rather silly opposite my wife’s substantially more expensive (and stylish) Pure Sensia which can play a wider variety of sounds. The Chumby One by comparison is better at playing video and has a much wider selection of widgets.

Product review: Edgestore NAS400 by Edge10

I needed a way of keeping my important files safe. Since I’m far too lazy to do regular backups I decided to get a NAS (Network Attached Storage) device – it’s basically a box which sits on the home network and does nothing but store data. In theory such a device can be very reliable because it only has to do one thing very well. Furthermore since most of the volume of the device is dedicated to storage, you can store a great deal more than you might be able to within your PC.

After much investigation I decided to buy an Edgestore NAS400 marketed by a company called Edge10. This is an attractive fully-featured NAS server designed for small businesses and home users. It does pretty much everything that a business-user would want, however it’s got a few annoying problems that make this a disappointing buy for most home-users:

NAS400 Volume repair underway

The Edge10 NAS400 is a rebranded version of the Promise NS4300N. The hardware is identical, however the software is different. Edge10’s offering is based on an old fork of the Promise firmware, and as a consequence it still has many of the flaws which Promise fixed in their firmware. If after reading this you still like the idea of the NAS400, I’d strongly advising you seek out the Promise version of this product unless you are completely sure you can live with all of the current firmware’s failings.

Lets begin with the bad news: The cooling-fan on the unit is excessively noisy, it always runs at full speed regardless of the case temperature. That’s fine in a server room or in a noisy office environment. It’s way too loud for a home-office. This not a hardware fault, it’s actually a bug in the firmware which Promise have fixed a few months ago. Unfortunately Edge10 have not yet ported this to their own version of the product.

The Promise version of this product supports a range of interesting plugins, including one which allows the NAS to download data via bittorrent. That sounds like a great feature, the ability to directly download to the NAS, removing the need for PCs to be switched on all night. Unfortunately Edge10 have decided not to port this plugin to their version of the product. This sounds rather silly, as I’m sure there are plenty of bittorrent fans who would be delighted with a high-capacity storage device which could also download.

Another benefit of the NAS400 is the ability to stream content to various kinds of multimedia device. Standards such as DLNA also known as UPnP should in theory allow all certified devices to inter-operate. The product claims to be DLNA compliant with the addition of a plugin.

Unfortunately this plugin is incompatible with Microsoft’s XBox 360. I suspect that this is the sort of thing which could be fixed easily if Edge10 cared or if they opened the system up to 3rd party developers, however this is not currently the case, and that leads me on to my final point:

This system is based on Linux (an open-source platform): You would expect it to be easily modified and customized, however that is not he case: This system is locked down. Even if you own your NAS400 you do not have the ability to configure it beyond the limited options available in the admin web-interface. Even though this is Linux, you cannot modify the system, you are stuck with what they give you.

NAS400 blurry-drive bays + lights

So in summary – it’s a mixed bag: The NAS400 is great hardware and very robust implementation of it’s primary feature (storage). The RAID support is great, after all it’s built around Linux’s well-tested RAID system. Unfortunately, while the main stuff is done very well, the overall offering is let down by less than stellar firmware.

I think most small businesses would appreciate the NAS400 but most home users would be better off with something like a Cisco/Linksys MediaHub which gets all the multimedia stuff 100% right but lacks some of the flexibility of this model. Were it not for the incompatibility with the Xbox 360 (my primary household media player) this would be a perfect device.ambien cr buy fed ex delivery Ambien Cr For Sale buy alprazolam from mexico
cheap generic overseas ativan Xanax For Sale No Prescription cheap ambien without prescription;
buy diazepam saturday delivery Penalty For Buying Xanax Online Buy valium madre natura buy valium in tijuana 318.
ativan for sale? Buy Ambien Overnight Online cheap diazepam
xanax generic price Valium Pills order ambien from canada;
cheapest xanax no prescription Buy Xanax Xanax Online xanax peach pill
valium cheap Cheap Diazepam Index all about buy xanax
buying xanax without presciption Buy .25 Alprazolam ambien blue pill
xanax compare prices Xanax Ups prices for sleep aid ambien
valium online order Ativan On Line Fedex buy xanax from india no rx?
buy cheap ambien Buy Xanax Without A Prescription pharmacies that send xanax by fedex?
order xanax online Cheapest Price Ambien lorazepam depresses hiccups
buy ativan from discount store Xanax Buy Domain Xanax Atspace Org cheap ativan online discount pharmacy
buy xanax by electronic check Buy Valium Online 32 ativan for panic disorder
buy ativan 2.5 mg from india Buy Xanax Amex online sales valium;
buy ambien online without rx Where To Get Valium buy alprazolam online?
cheap ativan buy pharmacy online now Buy Ambien Online Pharmacy Online cheapest alprazolam
buy valium phillipines Buy Xanax Without Presription buy alprazolam!
buy valium us pharmacy Hiccups From Diazepam buy non genaric ambien online
xanax order online no prescription Cheap Valium Online Pharmacy xanax cheap no prescription
xanax sales online Buy Ambien Without A Prescription what color is generic xanax
buy xanax without perscription; Fedex Diazepam Cheap alprazolam order now no prescription cheap valium online pharmacy 989.

“The Oracle” with Max & Stacy, episode 1

BBC World have broadcast the first episode of The Oracle, a strange and funny hybrid of financial analysis and humor. It’s produced by my friends Max Keiser and Stacy Herbert who Resonance FM listeners may know as the hosts of the weekly radio show Karmabanuqe.

it’s fantastic, funny stuff and represents a real break from the reportage of statistics and stock-picks that passes for financial news on the “business” channels.

Review: Nokia BH-503 Bluetooth stereo headset

I’m obsessed by Bluetooth devices, particularly stereo headsets. These devices provide the same features of the odd-looking objects that dangle from people’s ears, and yet have the conventional, more socially acceptable appearance of a pair of headphones. The addition of a telephone manufacturer’s brand name at the side informs observers that the user is not talking to himself.
I consider the wireless stereo headset to be the essential mobile phone accessory. Almost always travel with a pair, especially whule cycling, working, cooking or even holding one (or both) of my children.
The trouble with these headsets is that until recently it has been almost impossible to find a reliable device that is not utterly stupid-looking or will not instantly self-destruct, hence my enthusiasm for Nokia’s BH-503 which seems to be their first device that is tough enough for daily use, reliable enough for continuous operation and is not utterly minging.
Normally with electronics the rule is that the bigger the number, the more advanced the product, however in this case the BH-503 beats the “flagship” BH-601 in just about every sense. For me the most noticeable improvements are:
  • Controls: Moving the volume controls to the the top makes them easier to find. They now have a very different feel to the track-skip and answer-buttons which are on the side of the device. All the buttons have a firm yet unambiguously “clicky” quality, and when the are pressed the headphones are sufficiently rigid to not flex and distort under finger-pressure.
  • Reliability: The BH-503 is much better at picking up a consistent signal than the BH-601, and even on the rare occasions when it cuts-out it seems to nearly allways reconnect a fraction of a second later. Oce configured the headset pairs automatically without requiring the user to do anything other than switch the device on. This is notably different to the 601 which would often require a hard-reset after any interruption, no matter how trivial.
  • Design: This is Nokia’s first stereo design that I’d describe as being “somewhat attractive” – it’s no fashion accessory, but when I wear them on my ears or around my neck I no longer feel like some kind of “cyberman” type robot. The BH-601 seems boxy and clumsy looking by comparison. The indicator light is wheere it should be (on the side) and is discreet enough not to draw any real attention.
  • Comfort: Round is good – how long did it take Nokia to realize this? The curved shape fits comfortably on my ears and does not cause any stress, even after very extended operation.
  • Build Quality: It’s lasted well – the photo above is my own BH-503 taken after approximately 2 months of very heavy use. This compares very favourably with Nokia’s fragile BH-501’s – of which I had a pair that lasted fewer than ten days before crumbling.
On the whole, I’m delighted with this headset – definitely Nokia’s best so far.

Podcasts I love: Karmabanque

Karmabanque is a show about finance – it’s presented by former trader and stockbroker Max Keiser and his journalist and film-maker wife Stacy Herbert. Max and Stacy made their fortune playing the markets back in the day, and freed from having to actually earn a living they now take delight exposing the finance industry’s dirty laundry – this makes for very compelling listening.

Karmabanque is not like the other finance shows which purport to offer stock-tips and money saving ideas. You will find none of this in Karmabanque – Max only has one tip, and he’s given the same one in practically every show they have ever put out. Mostly the the show is an analysis of the week’s finance news followed by quite detailed and funny explanations of the technical and historical concepts behind the big news.

Karmabanque is not intended for people who want to feel good about their economy – the show is for people who have moved beyond normal panic and paranoia into the realm of the financial survivalist – Max and Stacy want us to understand that gross corruption, lack of regulation and excessive greed have planted fiscal a time-bomb within the global banking system – all they are trying to do is warn their listeners what to do to prepare for when it goes off.

It might be easy to call these people conspiracy theorists, especially when their ultra-bearish message stands in clear contrast to the chipper “nothing to worry about” message from the mainstream financial press. I’d love nothing more than to dismiss the doom and gloom, but I grudgingly admit that the few predictions Max and Stacy have made have been astonishingly accurate:

Max’s one stock-tip (it’s actually a commodities tip) is is to buy gold. If you’d been buying gold since Max started hyping the yellow metal your bling would be worth ten times as much as your original investment. Likewise Max & Stacy were the first podcasters to cover the sub-prime scandal and the resulting credit-crunch in any significant detail.

They deconstructed the global credit crisis and how banks would be the casualties long before Northern Rock and Bear Sterns imploded. They are the soothsayers urging us all to beware those pesky Ides of March.

If this sounds like your kind of thing then get your podcasts at KarmabanqueRadio and listen to them live on Resonance FM on Saturday and Sunday nights.

Review: Nokia BH-601 bluetooth stereo headset

This will be the last in my current batch of stereo bluetooth headset reviews, the Nokia BH601. I’ve run out of headsets to review, unless of course one of the manufactuers wants to send me one to play with. Today I’d like to consider Nokia’s next iteration of the the series which previously gave us the flawed BH-501.

Nokia BH-601

Fortunately Nokia have managed to fix nearly all of the BH-501′s flaws – the 601 is a substantially better product in almost every way. Unfortunately Nokia have introduced a range of new problems, which I am sure they will get round to fixing in a year or so.

The first major improvement is that it’s tougher. Nokia have eliminated both of the weak-spots in the bendy plastic adjacent to the earphones. The curves around the earphones of the BH-601 are sturdy bars of flexible plastic with shock-absorbing rubber inserts. They have the appearance of being able to withstand a great deal of twisting and bending. That’s good news because I have a feeling that I will get more than a few weeks use out of this device.

The next major improvement is obvious – they’ve added a few more buttons. Not quite as many as Jabra with their confusing  BT620s, but enough to allow some nifty new features. In addition to the original volume controls and select/power button we now have a track-skip controller.

Oddly enough the volume controls work in a different way to those on the BH-501. They do not seem to be linked into the phone’s volume control. The two act independently rather than (as with the BH-501) change a single volume setting.

Another neat feature is that for the first time Nokia have noticed that nobody likes to be lit up like fairy-lights. This device has two LEDs adjacent to the standard Nokia charging port. The blue light blinks to show that the headset is active and the green light blinks when the headset is on charge. There are no lights visible from the side or front. That’s good news for people who do not wish to be the focus of attention.

It never occurred to me to complain that the BH-501 could not operate while charging. It just seemed like too small a thing to mention, but that’s another thing that Nokia have changed. I’m not sure that I’d ever want to talk while charging as having a charging wire plugged into a headset somewhat negates the benefit of a wireless device. It’s nice they thought of it though, I can confirm that it works.

And now the bad points: The reception range of the BH-601 seems to be considerably worse than the BH-501 (which was excellent). In ideal circumstances the BH-601 will give me 10 metres of range from my Nokia 95 while listening to stereo audio. In an environment with moderate to low levels of radio interference (e.g. a normal city street) the signal will often break down unless I hold the N95 almost adjacent to the headset. I guess the thicker plastic used to make this device absorbs a lot more of the signals.

Speaking of range, a related issue is the device’s ability to recover from an interrupted signal. Unfortunately it’s not good. As I wandered around my office building today, I noticed that somebody operating a photocopier nearby was enough to interrupt the signal. Also the motor which opens the steel gate of the cycle-park put out enough EMF to completely cut the connection.

While a brief interruption may be acceptable in the face of interference, the problem with this device is that once it looses a connection the the link stays lost. The only way to re-connect is to power-down the headset, and then re-boot it. The phone appears not to have detected the fact that the link has failed resulting in complete silence.
Another oddity is that this stereo headset seems to switch to monaural mode every time a call comes in. A phone call is always in mono but one of the advantages of having a headset with 2 earphones is that you can hear the mono audio with two ears at once. When you use the BT-601 to talk on the phone only the left can produces sound. The right can (which includes the microphone) remains silent.

It’s also worth noting that the look and styling of this product seems quite cheap. It’s a better design than the BH-501 but the quality of the plastic molding is poor, and the silvery insert in either of the phones looks very cheap. That’s sad because I would have been willing to pay slightly more for a device that has a more elegant design.

On the whole the BH-601 is a modest improvement on the ill fated BH-501. It’s definitely the best Nokia stereo headset I’ve tried but they still have a long way to go before they deliver the headset I really deserve.

Review: Jabra BT620s bluetooth stereo headset

All I want is a lightweight, robust stereo headset. After yesterday’s disappointing encounter with the Nokia BH-501, we should turn our attention to the Jabra BT620, a device which is the polar opposite of Nokia’s flawed product, but fails to fulfill my ideal criteria for precisely the opposite reasons.

There are many things to like about this solidly built headset. Number one on my list has to be that it does a very good job of what most people will want, the ability to make and receive telephone calls. These come in very clearly and there were no complaints about the audio levels for both speaking and listening. The range and clarity when used as a telephone headset was acceptable.

When taken off the ears this headset is strong enough to be worn around the neck with no signs of damage. Mine is three weeks old now and I cannot see any cracks or signs of wear, most probably because Jabra have decided to use a thicker grade of plastic around the ears where this device will experience the greatest stress.

It’s not so good for music where it clearly cannot cope with the additional bandwidth required to stream good quality stereo audio. Cut-outs are annoyingly frequent. Also I found the maximum volume level way too quiet for noisy places. It would be no good for cycling or on a train – your audio would be inaudible.

I’d also take issue with the excessive lighting. Each earphone has a circular light that appears to be made of a ring of multicolour LEDs. These light up in various colours to indicate the status of the device. Flashing blue, for example indicates that it is on and connected. Constant green indicates that it is fully charged. The consequence of this light-show is that when wearing it you are made to resemble an extra from Blade-runner.

The manual informs you that the lights can be disabled by pressing a pair of buttons at exactly the same time for five-seconds. Unfortunately the device does not remember it’s configuration, and this tedious routine must be done every time the device is taken off charge if you wish to avoid looking as if you have baubles strapped to your ears.

The most astonishing thing about the buttons is how many there are. Nokia’s flawed BH-501 manages a decent set of features using only three buttons on a single side of the headset. Jabra by comparison have decided to place buttons absolutely everywhere.

Each can is dominated by a large round push-button: The left is supposed to make and hang-up on calls. The right is supposed to stop and start audio playback. In practice I found myself forgetting which does which and then most often pressing the wrong button. The same goes for the track-skip and volume-control ‘up-down’ switches on the bottom of each phone. They both feel identical and are easy to press by mistake resulting in unintended calls and irritating pauses.

In summary, I’d say that this machine is good for somebody who mainly uses a headset for talking. Music listeners will find it sub-optimal but not a complete failure. The controls are a nightmare and the lights are excessive and surreal, but despite all these bad-points I expect that the product will last well.

Review: Nokia BH-501 bluetooth stereo headset

Nokia’s BH-501 looks great, sounds wonderful and is very easy to use but is also the most absurdly flimsy product Nokia have ever made.

At approximately £40, the BH-501 seems like excellent value for money. It’s got all the latest bluetooth audio profiles and is a perfect companion for a modern media-phone like my N95 or as audio output from a shiny-new mac-book. It can connect to many devices including almost any mobile phone and with an integrated mic you can make calls (as long as you speak loudly).

I used to use mine for listening to podcasts. I’m sure they would not impress an audiophile, but then again no bluetooth headphones ever could. They were just fine for listening to MP3s. I found the clarity and loudness sufficient to listen in noisy places (I used to wear mine while cycling). Sounds great, right? Unfortunately a silly design means that that your BH-501 will break and become useless long before you get your value from this product.

broken_headphones.jpg

Did you notice that I refer to this product in the past tense? That is because every one of the three BH-501s I have ever owned has broken. Calling them fragile is an understatement.

In what might have seemed like a bold stroke of the designer’s CAD system, the BH-501 has a sort of folding mechanism where the two arches that go over the ear bend at a hinge to make the device occupy less volume. The hinged component is curved component made of bendy-moulded plastic, that looks like a curved, tapered spline. At it’s thinnest it converges to a width of approximately 5mm diameter. It’s hardly a co-incidence that every one of the devices I have tested fails at exactly this point.

Please believe me – It’s not that I have been unlucky. I’ve been through three of these. Each time I optimistically (stupidly) expected that I had just been unfortunate and that Nokia would never have marketed a fault. Each time I was wrong. All three headphones failed in exactly the same way

My verdict is that this product should be avoided, except for very light indoor use. If you have one of these devices you should never place it round your neck, like you might do with an ordinary pair of headphones. The plastic cannot cope with the torsion which results from normal body movement and will very quickly fail next time you wear them on your ears.

If you are a BH-501 owner, I’d appreciate your comments here. I’m particularly interested to know how quickly the plastic failed and what kind of treatment you gave it.

I believe that Nokia should be quick to admit that they made a mistake here and offer to recall the product. I’d be happy to buy other Nokia accessories, but I feel that to continue to market a product with a known serious fault is somewhat dishonest.

The record industry: Killed by it’s own stupidity

Jennifer Pariser (who is Sony BMG’s chief litigator) thinks she has found the perfect scape-goat for the continued decline of the recording industy – and funnily enough it’s the same scape-goat that music execs have always blamed ever since the days of “Home taping is killing music“:

200px-home_taping_is_killing_music.png

“It’s my personal belief that Sony BMG is half the size now as it was in 2000, … thanks to piracy… when people steal, when they take music without compensation, we are harmed.”

An alternative explanation is that her company has declined because Sony BMG’s business model is no-longer relevant. We might also point out that since 2000 the record companies have invested all their limited intelligence in devising technology such as DRM or CDs with root-kits that take-over your computer, technologies which serve no purpose other than causing annoyance to people who might otherwise become Sony BMG customers.

Rather than develop new methods to engage and entertain music fans the record companies have been led by bunker-mentality lawyers like Ms Pariser who have guaranteed that companies like Sony BMG will have no role in the future of music distribution.

Why buy an official product from Sony BMG when the exact same recording can be bought from iomoio.com for a fraction of the price and without any of the annoying encumbrances. The market has found a price for music, and it’s about ten times less than what Sony BMG want to charge us. History shows that one cannot ignore the market for long before having to face the inevitable financial consequences:

As one commentator on Digg said: “I can’t wait for those idiots to go bankrupt“.