- Controls: Moving the volume controls to the the top makes them easier to find. They now have a very different feel to the track-skip and answer-buttons which are on the side of the device. All the buttons have a firm yet unambiguously “clicky” quality, and when the are pressed the headphones are sufficiently rigid to not flex and distort under finger-pressure.
- Reliability: The BH-503 is much better at picking up a consistent signal than the BH-601, and even on the rare occasions when it cuts-out it seems to nearly allways reconnect a fraction of a second later. Oce configured the headset pairs automatically without requiring the user to do anything other than switch the device on. This is notably different to the 601 which would often require a hard-reset after any interruption, no matter how trivial.
- Design: This is Nokia’s first stereo design that I’d describe as being “somewhat attractive” - it’s no fashion accessory, but when I wear them on my ears or around my neck I no longer feel like some kind of “cyberman” type robot. The BH-601 seems boxy and clumsy looking by comparison. The indicator light is wheere it should be (on the side) and is discreet enough not to draw any real attention.
- Comfort: Round is good - how long did it take Nokia to realize this? The curved shape fits comfortably on my ears and does not cause any stress, even after very extended operation.
- Build Quality: It’s lasted well - the photo above is my own BH-503 taken after approximately 2 months of very heavy use. This compares very favourably with Nokia’s fragile BH-501’s - of which I had a pair that lasted fewer than ten days before crumbling.
Archive for the 'Gadget Reviews' Category
This will be the last in my current batch of stereo bluetooth headset reviews, the Nokia BH601. I’ve run out of headsets to review, unless of course one of the manufactuers wants to send me one to play with. Today I’d like to consider Nokia’s next iteration of the the series which previously gave us the flawed BH-501.
Fortunately Nokia have managed to fix nearly all of the BH-501′s flaws – the 601 is a substantially better product in almost every way. Unfortunately Nokia have introduced a range of new problems, which I am sure they will get round to fixing in a year or so.
The first major improvement is that it’s tougher. Nokia have eliminated both of the weak-spots in the bendy plastic adjacent to the earphones. The curves around the earphones of the BH-601 are sturdy bars of flexible plastic with shock-absorbing rubber inserts. They have the appearance of being able to withstand a great deal of twisting and bending. That’s good news because I have a feeling that I will get more than a few weeks use out of this device.
The next major improvement is obvious – they’ve added a few more buttons. Not quite as many as Jabra with their confusing BT620s, but enough to allow some nifty new features. In addition to the original volume controls and select/power button we now have a track-skip controller.
Oddly enough the volume controls work in a different way to those on the BH-501. They do not seem to be linked into the phone’s volume control. The two act independently rather than (as with the BH-501) change a single volume setting.
Another neat feature is that for the first time Nokia have noticed that nobody likes to be lit up like fairy-lights. This device has two LEDs adjacent to the standard Nokia charging port. The blue light blinks to show that the headset is active and the green light blinks when the headset is on charge. There are no lights visible from the side or front. That’s good news for people who do not wish to be the focus of attention.
It never occurred to me to complain that the BH-501 could not operate while charging. It just seemed like too small a thing to mention, but that’s another thing that Nokia have changed. I’m not sure that I’d ever want to talk while charging as having a charging wire plugged into a headset somewhat negates the benefit of a wireless device. It’s nice they thought of it though, I can confirm that it works.
And now the bad points: The reception range of the BH-601 seems to be considerably worse than the BH-501 (which was excellent). In ideal circumstances the BH-601 will give me 10 metres of range from my Nokia 95 while listening to stereo audio. In an environment with moderate to low levels of radio interference (e.g. a normal city street) the signal will often break down unless I hold the N95 almost adjacent to the headset. I guess the thicker plastic used to make this device absorbs a lot more of the signals.
Speaking of range, a related issue is the device’s ability to recover from an interrupted signal. Unfortunately it’s not good. As I wandered around my office building today, I noticed that somebody operating a photocopier nearby was enough to interrupt the signal. Also the motor which opens the steel gate of the cycle-park put out enough EMF to completely cut the connection.
While a brief interruption may be acceptable in the face of interference, the problem with this device is that once it looses a connection the the link stays lost. The only way to re-connect is to power-down the headset, and then re-boot it. The phone appears not to have detected the fact that the link has failed resulting in complete silence.
Another oddity is that this stereo headset seems to switch to monaural mode every time a call comes in. A phone call is always in mono but one of the advantages of having a headset with 2 earphones is that you can hear the mono audio with two ears at once. When you use the BT-601 to talk on the phone only the left can produces sound. The right can (which includes the microphone) remains silent.
It’s also worth noting that the look and styling of this product seems quite cheap. It’s a better design than the BH-501 but the quality of the plastic molding is poor, and the silvery insert in either of the phones looks very cheap. That’s sad because I would have been willing to pay slightly more for a device that has a more elegant design.
On the whole the BH-601 is a modest improvement on the ill fated BH-501. It’s definitely the best Nokia stereo headset I’ve tried but they still have a long way to go before they deliver the headset I really deserve.
All I want is a lightweight, robust stereo headset. After yesterday’s disappointing encounter with the Nokia BH-501, we should turn our attention to the Jabra BT620, a device which is the polar opposite of Nokia’s flawed product, but fails to fulfill my ideal criteria for precisely the opposite reasons.
There are many things to like about this solidly built headset. Number one on my list has to be that it does a very good job of what most people will want, the ability to make and receive telephone calls. These come in very clearly and there were no complaints about the audio levels for both speaking and listening. The range and clarity when used as a telephone headset was acceptable.
When taken off the ears this headset is strong enough to be worn around the neck with no signs of damage. Mine is three weeks old now and I cannot see any cracks or signs of wear, most probably because Jabra have decided to use a thicker grade of plastic around the ears where this device will experience the greatest stress.
It’s not so good for music where it clearly cannot cope with the additional bandwidth required to stream good quality stereo audio. Cut-outs are annoyingly frequent. Also I found the maximum volume level way too quiet for noisy places. It would be no good for cycling or on a train - your audio would be inaudible.
I’d also take issue with the excessive lighting. Each earphone has a circular light that appears to be made of a ring of multicolour LEDs. These light up in various colours to indicate the status of the device. Flashing blue, for example indicates that it is on and connected. Constant green indicates that it is fully charged. The consequence of this light-show is that when wearing it you are made to resemble an extra from Blade-runner.
The manual informs you that the lights can be disabled by pressing a pair of buttons at exactly the same time for five-seconds. Unfortunately the device does not remember it’s configuration, and this tedious routine must be done every time the device is taken off charge if you wish to avoid looking as if you have baubles strapped to your ears.
The most astonishing thing about the buttons is how many there are. Nokia’s flawed BH-501 manages a decent set of features using only three buttons on a single side of the headset. Jabra by comparison have decided to place buttons absolutely everywhere.
Each can is dominated by a large round push-button: The left is supposed to make and hang-up on calls. The right is supposed to stop and start audio playback. In practice I found myself forgetting which does which and then most often pressing the wrong button. The same goes for the track-skip and volume-control ‘up-down’ switches on the bottom of each phone. They both feel identical and are easy to press by mistake resulting in unintended calls and irritating pauses.
In summary, I’d say that this machine is good for somebody who mainly uses a headset for talking. Music listeners will find it sub-optimal but not a complete failure. The controls are a nightmare and the lights are excessive and surreal, but despite all these bad-points I expect that the product will last well.
Nokia’s BH-501 looks great, sounds wonderful and is very easy to use but is also the most absurdly flimsy product Nokia have ever made.
At approximately £40, the BH-501 seems like excellent value for money. It’s got all the latest bluetooth audio profiles and is a perfect companion for a modern media-phone like my N95 or as audio output from a shiny-new mac-book. It can connect to many devices including almost any mobile phone and with an integrated mic you can make calls (as long as you speak loudly).
I used to use mine for listening to podcasts. I’m sure they would not impress an audiophile, but then again no bluetooth headphones ever could. They were just fine for listening to MP3s. I found the clarity and loudness sufficient to listen in noisy places (I used to wear mine while cycling). Sounds great, right? Unfortunately a silly design means that that your BH-501 will break and become useless long before you get your value from this product.
Did you notice that I refer to this product in the past tense? That is because every one of the three BH-501s I have ever owned has broken. Calling them fragile is an understatement.
In what might have seemed like a bold stroke of the designer’s CAD system, the BH-501 has a sort of folding mechanism where the two arches that go over the ear bend at a hinge to make the device occupy less volume. The hinged component is curved component made of bendy-moulded plastic, that looks like a curved, tapered spline. At it’s thinnest it converges to a width of approximately 5mm diameter. It’s hardly a co-incidence that every one of the devices I have tested fails at exactly this point.
Please believe me - It’s not that I have been unlucky. I’ve been through three of these. Each time I optimistically (stupidly) expected that I had just been unfortunate and that Nokia would never have marketed a fault. Each time I was wrong. All three headphones failed in exactly the same way
My verdict is that this product should be avoided, except for very light indoor use. If you have one of these devices you should never place it round your neck, like you might do with an ordinary pair of headphones. The plastic cannot cope with the torsion which results from normal body movement and will very quickly fail next time you wear them on your ears.
If you are a BH-501 owner, I’d appreciate your comments here. I’m particularly interested to know how quickly the plastic failed and what kind of treatment you gave it.
I believe that Nokia should be quick to admit that they made a mistake here and offer to recall the product. I’d be happy to buy other Nokia accessories, but I feel that to continue to market a product with a known serious fault is somewhat dishonest.
The worlds most famous skeptical investigator is famous for debunking celebrity charlatans like the nonsense-talking, spoon-bending mystic Uri Geller. I’m glad to say that he also has time to educate the world about entirely materialistic forms of flim-flam: this week he has turned his attention to the high-end hifi industry, specifically their tendancy to sell outrageously priced “interconnects” and speaker cables to gullible “audiophiles”.
Having served my time in community radio, I can be sure that there is no audible difference between an interconnect costing 50p and one which costs £50. There is a practical difference, which is that you have £49.50 less to spend on more important studio devices.
No recording studios engineer make use of high-end cables - they use whatever they find in the studio-spares bin which is mainly cheap, disposable cables. Good recording studios are full of expensive equipment, but these are things like mixing-desks and recording devices. The interconnects between these devices will usually be twisted-pair copper or cheap fibre-optic.
The entire CD mastering process introduces so much distortion into the recording that even if the quality of interconnects and speaker-cable made a difference it would be utterly insignificant compared to the amount of ‘noise’ that is intrinsically part of any recording.
For these reasons, I expect that James Randi’s challenge will remain un-accepted for the foreseeable future.
Marketing types are usually quick to point out how Apple, alone in the I.T. world “get” their customers, and how other companies (usually Microsoft) fall short of Apple’s shining example. It seems that this time Apple have out microsofted Microsoft with their lamentable iPhone, perhaps the most over-hyped and disappointing device in the history of technology.
I cannot think of a more effective way to annoy customers off than to perpetrate a monumental bait and switch campaign: Simply tease your most loyal, avid customers with the prospect of owning the most powerful and capable phone and then deliver it with ties to unfair contracts and surreal restrictions, and a promise that attempting to take-back your iPhone will result in exclusion from Apple’s fun-club. All you have to do is sufficiently annoy these customers and they will start telling all their friends how much they hate your products… and that is exactly what Apple just did.
Apple’s biggest crime is to threaten anybody who has unlocked their phones with the possibility that their iPhone might be rendered incompatible with future updates, or at worst completely “bricked“. Concerned by the popularity of the iPhone unlocks, Apple are clearly trying to frighten people into not unlocking their phones. And why are people so obsessed with ‘unlocking’ - it’s simply a means to restore the level of functionality we expect from any smartphone to Apple’s artificially restricted device.
We should also mention the fact that Apple also made their new devices artificially incompatible with play-list managers other than iTunes and don’t even try to use your previous generation of iPod accessories.
All the features that customers have been trying to hack back into the iPhone have been standard on mid-range Nokia phones for almost a year. Unlike Apple, Nokia provide multiple SDKs in and support for a wide range of open-source languages. While the Nokia apps may sometimes lack Apple’s bling, Nokia benefits from a wider range of applications that mostly do what you’d expect. My personal favorite is Nokia Podcasting which downloads all the audio I need without ever needing to sync to a PC. Somehow I doubt apple will ever want to do that, as it would mean revealing just how redundant iTunes has become.
I suggest Nokia should take advantage of this situation - they should let the world know what a disaster the iPhone is becoming long ahead of it’s launch in the UK. And at the same time they should remind potential customers that the they already give away for free the exact features that Apple do not want their customers to enjoy.
I was too quick to criticize this product: It turns out that it was not faulty at all, I had merely installed the soft-rubber gromets incorrectly which caused the delecate wave-guide to become bunged. In the end there was no need to return them, there was no fault.
Sorry Shure - for now you are back in my good books and your product gets the Stodge.org seal of approval (for what that is worth). If the Shure audio company has not been made bankrupt by my cruel remarks and the boycott of all their products that might have occured as a consequence, I apologise. I shall not malign thee any more.

When I was planning to return my ec3 earphones, I bought a spare pare of Shure ec2 earphones which are excellent but now redundant. My ec2 remains in it’s plastic box, unused and unloved.
Owning two pairs of nearly identical earphones is as crazy as “taking two bottles into the shower”; A practice which Vidal Sasoon abolished in the late 80s.
I predict that one lucky friend will find this in their parcel on St. Jesu’s day - will it be you?
My Treo 650 is an odd device; it combines one of the best interfaces of any mobile device with strong multimedia and is not a bad phone. On the other hand, it has many obvious omissions and deficiencies; It is as if device was designed by a genius, and then in a last-minute cost-cutting operation, features were removed at random by an angry monkey:
Its far to easy to bemoan the Treo 650’s lack of WiFi, and the lame excuses provided by PalmOne; who rather incredibly stated that it would be technically impossible to build a hand held device that could use Bluetooth, GSM and 802.11b.
It took the work of a gifted hacker to show that all Treo 650 devices are perfectly capable of using the PalmOne WiFi adaptor; exposing PalmOne’s rhetoric as the contemptuous bullshit. If only this were the only weakness holding back the Treo 650.
Clearly, this feature was disabled at the request of the phone company who greedily wish us to use their overpriced GPRS data-services for all networking; This does not quite explain some other glaring inadequacies of Palm OS;
For example why do we have to put up with Hotsync; the primary technology used to synchronize the Palm device with a PC. Hotsync was looking rather stale back in 1999 when Microsoft first unveiled their dynamic ‘ActiveSync’ technology which allowed real-time replication of data between PC and pocket devices. In the last five years Hotsync remains conceptually unchanged from it’s very first incarnation.
At this point Hotsync apologists will wonder what I am complaining about; after all it is the simplest cross-platform synchronization technology and it does a relatively good job of replicating simple data.
My gripe is that it is slow compared to modern replication techniques – one need only look at rsync to see how blindingly efficient synchronization can be. Hotsync devices cannot be mounted as file systems, making it tedious to load a palm with non palm-native files. For example, there is no convenient way to load a Palm device with MP3 files even though it is perfectly capable of playing them.
And while I am on the subject; why doesn’t Palm OS provide native Bluetooth and USB Mass-Storage emulation? Sure there are commercial products (costing about $20 each) that add this feature; but which palm user does not need to transfer files? Why are Palm not licensing these programs for all Palm OS users in an effort to be minimally competitive?
I am baffled that PalmOne cannot see the problem here; Microsoft users have been able to drag and drop files into their Pocket devices for years now; this feature is blatantly missing from Palm OS, which offerers roughly the same set of core features as it did five years ago.
Actually this is a theme that runs through the whole Palm OS experience; that of opportunities missed and a strange, antique selection of desktop applications which have somewhat failed to keep up with the times. Take multimedia – Palm has placed it’s trust firmly with RealMedia who have made one of the worst music-player applications for the platform.
Why make the device standardize on the least widely used audio format; wouldn’t it be best to bundle the system with a really good multi-format audio player? What about an audio player that could emulate a number of leading hardware MP3 players in order to work with the most common music library software. How hard would that be?
I think you get my drift here; The Treo 650 is a great device; Its still the best organizer phone. It is still the best for texting and overall ease of use, but it could have been so much more. A combination of corporate interests and a lack of imagination add up to a whole lot of wasted opportunity.
Until very recently I would have been willing state publicly that all “smart phones” are stupid. While gaget industries have been able to make perfectly functional personal organizers, and sleek mobile phones, the combination of of these concepts is usually less than the sum of it’s parts.

PocketTunes running on my Treo 650. This application gives the device capabilities similar to an iPod mini. With the 1GB SD card I can store and play plenty of Ogg-Vorbis tracks.
I’ve been fooled into parting with cash for the latest upgrade; my crisp pounds exchanged for flaky plastic: I’ve grown so jaded with the category that I had the lowest expectations when I placed an order for the new PalmOne Treo 650 from Orange. It turns out that I was wrong to be so glum – the new Treo is one of the niftiest gadgets I’ve owned in a long time.
The major selling point of the Treo series is it’s use of Palm OS. Most smart phones these days run Microsoft’s bloated “Windows Mobile Edition” or the rather annoying Symbian family of operating system.
Palm OS, one of the oldest mobile operating systems was originally designed to run on 3Com’s range of Palm-Pilot organizers; tiny machines which could run for days on a pair of AAA batteries. The reason Palm were able to do this was that they take a stripped down approach to computing; While palm apps tend to have fewer features than their Windows equivalents the minimalist approach seems more suitable for tiny devices.
Returning to Palm OS felt very comfortable; my last Palm device was the Palm 3c, which I destroyed by dropping in a puddle almost five years ago.
While the Palm OS is superficially as minimalist as ever, there are a lot more bells and whistles included in the latest version of the software: It’s now a fully multitasking system with impressive multimedia capabilities and support for high-resolution screens. Most importantly, it worked perfectly with the Kpilot, my preferred Linux-based synchronization tool. Being able to synch with my Linux Desktop is a big win gain.
The biggest change is the addition of the thumb-board in place of the graffiti area. The original palm-pilots had an excellent handwriting recognition system which was very easy to learn. I guess the success of the Blackberry proved that busy executives prefer thumb-boards and are unwilling to learn how to use a stylus. While I miss graffiti, I have found the thumb-board very easy to adapt to.
My Treo came with a suite of standard Internet tools; Oddly enough, their icons have been made slightly orangy – and put into a category called ‘Orange’, a feeble attempt by my phone company to brand the Internet. This was easily defeated by renaming the category which allowed me to debrand my palmtop.
The tools include web-browser called ‘Blazer’ which does a very good job of rendering most pages. I was able to visit my favorite sites and read them without difficulty.
Palm also provide an excellent email program called Versamail which supports POP3 and IMAP with SSL. A nifty feature of this program is that it includes standard configurations for the 50 biggest ISPs, meaning that setting up an email account requires little more than typing in a login and password.
When the machine was launched, palm gurus complained that the machine was less efficient than previous generations at managing memory; apparently the new filing system takes a less granular approach to storage and has a tendency to waste a few kilobytes if a database or resource partially occupies a page of system memory.
Having not used a Palm OS machine in five years, I cannot say I noticed a memory shortage. Just in case I also bought a 1GM SD RAM card which provides storage for documents and MP3/Ogg files. With the supplied headset, I can use my Palm somewhat like an iPod mini.
Minor quibbles aside, this is a good machine. It feels solidly built and is very easy to use. I expect that Palm will win back a group of users like myself who have defected to Sony and Nokia products in the absence of a credible Palm OS based alternative.




