Monthly Archive for August, 2005

To Serve and Protect

Police Vs Bad Guyz

What was the inspiration for Sir Ian Blair (the Metropolitan Police Comissioner’s) allegedly covered-up shoot to kill policy? I suggest that he is modeling the new London police-force on the characters from this “Police Vs Bad Guyz” playset that I found in Tesco.

As you can see, each police officer comes with a selection of machine-guns, tasers and riot shields. These cops are ready and willing to bring in their quarry, dead or alive. They fight the “War Against Terror”, with the awesome, overpowering might of all oversized guns blazing.

The motto of the “Police” is “Catch the Bad Guyz, Lock ‘em up”, a sentement that would not be encouraged by the Howard league for penal reform. The playsets do not appear to include a “Police vs Bad Guyz” magistrate’s court, nor any solicitors or any characters able to provide due process of law. One can only assume that these police are allowed to lock up anybody who is significantly shifty-looking.

This is entirely reasonable, given that the bad guys in On the other hand, the “Bad Guyz” in question dress in an obviously criminal fashion. The “Police” can safely shoot to kill when they see a perp wearing a cyber-enhanced prison-uniform. Of course in the real-world, a moderately puffy jacket is a dead giveaway of teroristic intent.

Gallerycrashing: Interventionist Art, Causes for Alarm and Excuses for Failure

The term gallerycrashing is a clumsy neologism I have coined to refer to the act of placing an unsolicited artwork in a private or public exhibition. Specialised circuits were constructed for the sole purpose of gallerycrashing and a family of objects called ‘Spacehoggers’ were gradually developed for proliferation around galleries.

The Spacehogger takes the form of a triangular wooden slab bearing a simple alarm based device and an FM transmitter with a small built-in microphone, literally designed to hog space and relay the evidence to an radio receiver with audio recorder. When it is fully armed, any attempts at relocation activate a failsafe: a 120dB alarm tone, dissuading people from tampering with it or moving it.

[The Spacehoggers DVD is now online courtesy of Archive.org. This entire article was written by Dan Wilson - Sal.]

The alarm can be sensitivised to many physical interferences by usage of mercury based vibration sensors, distance sensors, or contact points resting on an existing conductive surface within the gallery space. In the case of the latter contact point method, it actively engages with the space in which it subsists, seeming the most attractive technique as it literally becomes paradoxically reliant on the architecture, unlike the other methods that leave the artwork detached from the space. Furthermore, it is far more economical to build an inverted transistorised circuit exploiting metal surfaces already present in the space.

So this became my preferred method, bearing in mind the fact that reclaiming these Spacehoggers after sneaky installation in galleries would most likely be unfeasible. After the abandonment it is imperative that disassociation with the artwork is executed as quickly as possible, not only due to the act’s possibly perilous consequences, but also to avoid becoming entangled as a prime character in the exploit, shifting the attention away from the gallerycrashing itself. So the device is sacrificed to the whims of the curators, and any strategic decisions they take as a result of the gallerycrashing become artistic offshoots: candid performance art instigated at the induction of a Spacehogger.

I seek to discredit the elitism rife not only in large established city galleries, but also in prim provincial galleries where doors (and minds) are closed to alternative or progressive artforms- much in a similar sentiment to JJ Xi and Cai Yuan in their ‘Two Artists Open Fire’ where they dress in mafia costumes and fire shots with fake pistols around a Royal Academy exhibition. “The reference to the mafia gave a direct allusion to the closed world of art in the establishment” [1]. Meanwhile, my method has no levity or perceptible performance absurdity to evoke any endearment to its targets, but on the other hand I do hope absurdity will be generated through the curators’ inept attempts to disarm the Spacehogger, hence the foolishness of their actions will prove instrumental in my success at discrediting their elitist posturings.

The artwork shouldn’t rest upon the hogger’s hardware or its design, the attention should be shifted onto the manner in which the curators deal with the alien device. Galleries are perhaps the only places other than amusement parks where reality and fiction officially intersect, thus enabling even the most unremarkable gesture carried out within the space to undergo comfortable artistic transitions. Beneath this safe sugar coating of superficiality, there lurk real threats that could hinder any interventionist efforts.

Gallerycrashing by its very nature is invasive, possessing the potential to stir up allsorts of ugly situations- so to counterbalance this I attempted to behave in the most unintimidating way possible: camply (acknowledging the widespread popularity of camp comic TV characters, eg. Frank Spencer; “ooo Betty” [Some Mothers Do 'Ave 'Em]). However, this theory proved to be quite misplaced in practice where I was instantly seized prior to any Spacehogger touchdown; the curator became more enraged in tandem with my increasing feyness, possibly also contributing to the encountered failures of communication.

In Bishop’s Stortford’s Waytemore Gallery (comprising of the pomp that is Florence Walk) I attempted to persuade the curator/manager (Svetlana; a fake blond uppity, hugely bitchy European woman whom I had been keeping under surveillance for a few months prior to the gallerycrashing) to examine a “new piece of artwork”, but was met by hostility. As I placed it over the metal tract to quietly arm the alarm, the curator’s stiletto clad foot kept kicking it away forcefully, preventing the installation from occurring. An hour later I returned with more bravura to place the Spacehogger at lightening speed, but this was an even worse disaster, as I’ll explain later.

Continue reading ‘Gallerycrashing: Interventionist Art, Causes for Alarm and Excuses for Failure’

Resonance FM @ The Serpentine Gallery

DSC_0398

This week is your last chance to see the Rirkrit Tiravanija exhibition at London’s Serpentine Gallery, and in particular the Resonance FM studio-type thing at the very centre of the building. In just over a week’s time, the entire inner structure will be dismantled in preperation for the next exhibition.

I went today and took many photos.

“CIOs don’t get fired for using Microsoft products”

Treo 650 owners like myself will at least sympathise with this: It’s obvious that Palm 5 is the “swan song” for this once mighty and ubiquitous handheld operating system. I confidently predict that there will never be another Palm OS 5 based smartphone from Palm, nor will any manufacturer including Palm build any hardware based on Palm 6 Operating System. The Palm OS ride is over, wasn’t it fun?

According to this CNET article, Palm (the company that invented the eponymous Palm Pilot personal organiser) is mulling over a switch to Windows as it’s primary handheld operating system. Justifying a switch to Microsoft’s platform, Palm’s CFO stated “CIOs don’t get fired for using Microsoft products”.

I remember about fifteen years ago people used to say exactly the same thing about buying IBM. Whenever you see technology companies justifying technical decisions on the basis of what is least likely to get an individual fired it’s a sure sign of impending doom.

Surely a technology company like Palm should be making it’s tech decisions based on what is likely to deliver the best value for customers, and therefore drive the greatest sales. If this requires Palm becoming yet another ‘Me Too’ Windows based handheld builder then so be it. I suspect that Palm can do better than this. Remember, Palm once made their name from selling technology products that were radical and unique at the time they were invented. The leaders are now followers.

On the other hand, what about Microsoft? They were once the company that displaced that lumbering giant IBM. They brilliantly took advantage of the market’s disaffection for it’s leader. IBM (for all their apparent benevolence) were the company who invented FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt) as a negative marketing policy and are responsible for the monopolistic bankruptcy of many more rivals than Microsoft. IBM’s reputation for arrogance and screwing customers still is legendary.

Microsoft have reached the point that IBM did fifteen years ago. It’s the point when everybody believes that the leader is invincible that normally signals the beginning of the end. Perhaps CIOs don’t get fired for choosing Microsoft, but they don’t get promoted either.

Nikon, Apple - Get a grip!

Why is it my photos all look a wee bit wonky? The colours are not quite right. Yes, you can blame my incompetence as a photographer but please save some of that blame for Nikon (the company that makes my camera) and Apple the geniuses behind iPhoto.

Scary Doggie
Fix these problems or I shall set the hounds on ye…

Nikon, you have made a spectacular machine with amazing optical and electronic properties; You give amateur photographers exactly what they wanted: A sturdy high-performance DSLR with a fast high-resolution sensor and a great kit-lens. But (you fools), you cripple it by making your RAW output format proprietary, closed source and if that were not a nuisance enough you go and encrypt it so that software makers have no idea how to interoperate with your kit.

Apple, you have made a brilliantly integrated and beautiful operating system. It’s widely regarded as being matchless in it’s usability. You were also the first to invent a universal photo-management application; Like all your products, you made it a thing of beauty and a joy to use; and then you invented iPhoto version five which keeps crashing and does not support the RAW file-formats of leading camera makers.

To Nikon I say, open up your formats before you upset your customers. To Apple I say, you had better sort this out quickly before Google port Picasa to the Mac platform.

Now if only we photo-geeks could find a way to bash some corporate heads together, who knows what might happen.

FedEx fails to heed the “Barbra Streisand Effect”

We learn from today’s Slashdot that Fedex sent legal ‘nastygrams’ to a young artist whose latest project was to make items of household furniture from redundant FedEx shipping containers. These shipping containers are given away free, and were obtained legally, so why was this young man threatned with entirely bogus leagal action?

Apparantly FedEx were concerned that people like you would follow this young man’s example and swap your mahogany ecretoire for a replacment made from packing cases provided at FedEx’s expense. Naturally they assumed that cautioning this man was a prudent move, the better to discourage you (dear reader) from abusing their generosity.

Had FedEx’s lawyers studied a famous crooner’s failed attempts to censor an inconvenient web-site, they might have acted more subtly or not all:

The Barbra Streisand Effect is (as the name suggests) named after the hapless discoverer of this phenomena. Barbra attempted to sue a company which had published a free photographic survey of the California coastline that just happened to include images of Streisand’s palacial holiday home.

Streisand’s case was thrown out, and ultimately she achieved the opposite of what she had wanted; rather than protect her privacy by forcing the surveyors to take-down the photo, it brought the image to the whole world’s attention. Including people like me who wouldn’t normally care what part of the world Mrs Striesand like so call home. Of course, if Barbra’s lawyers had been aware of recent history they might have shown more caution.

Barbra was not the first fool to discover this remarkable effect; Back in the early days of the Internet, a company called ‘eToys.com’ sued an international arts collective called eToy for an alleged trademark infringement. Ironically, eToy had existed years before eToys. It was no surprise that the case was thrown out, almost bankrupting eToys.com, and substantially boosting the international credibility of the eToy collective.

There seems to be a pattern or a principle at work here: Heavy handed legal action intended to cause censorship of the Internet often causes a dispportionately large but opposite effect. Lets put this theory to test:

When FedEx sued, did the artist shut his down permanently as requested? No, he consulted his lawyer who advised him that the complaint was bogus and that he should continue his project. In the meantime, blogs, journals and newspapers picked up the story. Ultimately the attempted censorship resulted in the story becoming many times bigger than it ever could have been if it had been simply left alone: just another Linux-geek making odd-looking furniture in his bachelor pad.

I suppose this also proves the adage “Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it”

Why DRM is good for you, or how I learned to stop worrying and love Microsoft

Actually you must have me confused with Christopher Baus. I think DRM is the most boneheaded and harmful idea to have come to the whacky world of online-media (and this is the industry that gave us Boo.com and the dot-com bubble). DRM stands for “Digital Rights Management”, a collection of computing technologies that restrict what you can do with digital content.

For example, a DRM scheme might allow a song to be only played three times. An attempt to play the song a fourth time will fail because the DRM scheme will not permit you to do so. Another kind of DRM might limit a downloaded song to be played on a single machine only. If you copy the files onto a CD and give them to a friend they will not play.

DRM does not manage your rights, it restricts them. I’m not going to justify my feelings with meaningless phrases like “Information wants to be free… man”. I do not need to tell you about erosion of Fair-Use, because no such concept exists in British Law. There are many other compelling reasons why DRM is an awful thing.

As a Linux user most of these DRM schemes are irrelevant to me. The DRM encumbered files are unplayable unless I spend time cracking the content. This is a nuicance, Fortunately I do not need to be a hacker to play downloaded content.

You can take advantage of the network to buy content from countries with more consumer friendly copyright laws. The notorious AllOfMp3.com Russian music store has an enormous range of premium content, all sold without DRM and at a fraction of the price of the western stores. DRM is like locking and double-bolting all of your upstairs windows, but forgetting that the front-door is not only wide-open but illuminated by a giant flashing neon sign. Would you wait until somebody lets you into the thief-proof window or just legitimately walk through the front door?

DRM policies are just as much about locking content buyers into specific hardware and software platforms as they are about reducing piracy of that content. Microsoft want to keep you using Windows. And if you switch from Windows to a rival product, you will forfeit your DRM encumbered music collection. Apple, Napster and the other media companies are no better.

If you switch from Apple iTunes to Napster, will you still be able to play DRM encumbered tunes with the other company’s tools? If you emigrate from Europe to America will your iTunes content licenses remain valid, or will your content suddenly become unplayable? Who knows – to some extent the most off-putting thing about DRM is not ever knowing what you cannot do.

In summary, DRM is a self-defeating short term strategy: DRM punishes the honest music-fan and will not deter even a moderately determined pirate. Eventually Microsoft and all will realise that customers do not want DRM but it will take them a long and painful years for them to come to this realisation. In the meantime AllOfMp3.com will have become very wealthy.

The Immense Duck-Pond

The immense duck-pond 1

Could this be the immense duck-pond that Dobson wrote about in his celebrated (but sadly out of print) “Immense Duck-Pond Pamphlet“? More information can be found on Frank Key’s Hooting Yard website.

SourceForge to Offer Subversion Service

I remember when SourceForge was new, it was revolutionary. Sourceforge gave poor developers the means to host an open source project in public. SourceForge did for free what might be otherwise costly to set up. It gave users a version control system, a bug-tracker, a forum and a home page all as a turnkey solution.

That was then… Now I regard it as a nuisance. I’ts built around the antique CVS source-control system which while technically still better than Microsoft SourceSafe, has been overtaken by other technologies, most notably Subversion. CVS based projects are a nuisance to keep up to date compared to SVN. Put simply, if you are still using CVS, please give it up. Subversion does everything that CVS does only faster, better and with less hassle.

Allegedly Sourceforge will be launching a subversion trial service sometime soon; but will anybody want it now that SVN has made version control trivial to DIY? It might be far too late, as people who do not care about SVN will stick with SourceForge, and people who do have long since moved away.

Community Leaders

Whenever a minority group is outraged or perhaps contains elements responsible for an outrage, who do the media turn to for a sound-bite? Why of course to the “Community Leaders”. These self appointed spokesmen have become the voice of minorities, and often reflect the very worst that any group has to offer.

But who are these so-called community leaders? I suspect that the phrase is a convenient news-media euphemism; a way of justifying a nearly random and ignorant choice of sources. Why bother researching anything when you can ring up the nearest mosque, temple, scientology depot or church and ask for the nuttiest member of the congregation? The more nutty they are the more likely they are to want to speak out.

This person will usually have no qualification apart from a bigoted loathing of some other so-called ‘community’ and a desire to expose his or her feelings to the nation. This person has been chosen to produce the most controversial sound bites. His words are guaranteed to catalyse fear because we are told that he represents a “community”. In our minds we picture a desperate band of similarly angry individuals, all hell-bent on OUR destruction.

And what of these alleged communities that the leaders allegedly lead? Do they represent thousands, hundreds or perhaps the only their extended family. No Muslim I know had even heard of Omar Bakri until his recent outbursts, and yet he was held to be a Muslim community leader. The phrase “Muslim Community” is of course an absurd simplification - do all Muslims know each other? Do they all even share the same values? Have they all agreed to be lead by the same organisation?

Clearly not all “Community Leaders” are as pathologically dangerous as Mr Bakri, but many of the people who allegedly represent minorities are exceptional cranks. They represent aberrations of their so-called communities. Would we call David Icke a British Community leader? Perhaps the BBC would care to nominate Gene Ray as a spokesman for American science?

A quick search of the BBC News Archive show that community leaders are far more frequently quoted than “insider sources“, but have a very long way to go before they eclipse that mainstay of communication, “The spokesperson